| |
Prestructural/Unitstructural (Beginning)
|
Multistructural (Developing)
|
Relational (Accomplished)
|
Score
|
|
Lesson Plan
|
|
Lesson
Overview
|
0 points
Overview is missing or does not identify the core objective(s) of the lesson
|
2 points
Overview is present but only partially describes the core objective(s) of the lesson
|
4 points
Overview is concise and accurately describes the core objectives and outcomes of the lesson
|
|
|
Essential
Questions/
Generalizations
|
0 points
Question(s) is not connected to the standards and/or is poorly worded.
|
2 points
Question(s) is somewhat related to the standards but is not explicit or well stated.
|
4 points
Essential question(s) is important, connected to the Standards, and strategically stated.
|
|
|
Engaging Question/
Setup/
Anticipatory
Set
|
0 points
Anticipatory set is missing or connects with only 1 or 2 of the purposes of anticipatory set.
|
2 points
Anticipatory set connects with 3 or 4 of the purposes of anticipatory set.
|
4 points
Anticipatory set connects with all 5 of the 5 purposes of anticipatory set.
|
|
|
Detailed
Lesson
Description
|
0 points
Lesson description is vague or is a shallow overview of the lesson.
|
4 points
Lesson description is accurate but incomplete.
|
8 points
Lesson description is complete and accurately describes the richness of the lesson.
|
|
|
Alignment
With Standards
|
0 points
Standards alignment is missing or does not accurately align with the lesson.
|
2 points
Standards alignment is in a format that is complete but not as required; addresses many of the knowledge and performance standards within the lesson.
|
4 points
Standards alignment is in the correct format and addresses both knowledge and performance standards that fit the lesson and represents thoughtful consideration of the lesson objectives and learning outcomes
|
|
|
Assessment
|
0 points
Assessments are missing or include only one or two measures of student progress.
|
2 points
Assessments are relevant but are not rich enough to greatly aid in adjusting teaching.
|
4 points
Assessments are rich and include various forms of determining student learning and teaching effectiveness.
|
|
|
Resources
|
0 points
Some resources are listed but only those which are obvious.
|
2 points
Resources are listed but do little more than fulfill the minimum expectations for the lesson and do not contribute to enrichment.
|
4 points
All forms of resources—hardware, software, curriculum, etc.—add to and complete the objectives of the Mixbook.
|
|
|
Accommodations
|
0 points
Accommodations to technology are absent.
|
2 points
Accommodations are mentioned but in a minimal way.
|
4 points
Technology accommodations have been thought through and the resulting list is thorough and complete.
|
|
|
Daily
Plans
|
0 points
Daily plans are missing or sketchy and do not demonstrate careful forethought and planning.
|
2 points
Daily plans are developmental and the tasks have been distributed in a way that makes sense.
|
4 points
Daily plans are developmental, complete, coherent, connected, and demonstrate a high degree of attention to detail.
|
|
|
Overall Aesthetics
|
|
Overall Visual Appeal
|
0 points
There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography.
|
2 points
Graphic elements sometimes, but not always, contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.
|
4 points
Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas and relationships. Differences in type size and/or color are used well and consistently.
|
|
|
Coherence & Flow
|
0 points
Getting through the Mixbook is confusing and unconventional.
|
2 points
There are a few places where the learner can get lost and lose connections from one page to the next.
|
4 points
Coherence and flow are seamless. It is always clear to the learner what all the pieces are and how they connect.
|
|
|
Mechanical Aspects
|
0 points
There are more than 5 misplaced or missing images, badly sized tables, misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
|
2 point
There are some misplaced or missing images, badly sized tables, misspellings and/or grammatical errors.
|
3 points
No mechanical problems noted.
|
|
|
Overall Quality of the Lesson
|
|
Cognitive Level of the Task
|
0 points
Task requires simply comprehending or retelling of information found on web pages and answering factual questions.
|
3 points
Task is doable but is limited in its significance to students' lives. The task requires analysis of information and/or putting together information from several sources.
|
6 points
Task is doable and engaging, and elicits thinking that goes beyond rote comprehension. The task requires synthesis of multiple sources of information, and/or taking a position, and/or going beyond the data given and making a generalization or creative product.
|
|
|
Clarity of Process
|
0 points
Process is not clearly stated. Students would not know exactly what they were supposed to do just from reading this.
|
2 points
Some directions are given, but there is missing information. Students might be confused.
|
4 points
Every step is clearly stated. Most students would know exactly where they are at each step of the process and know what to do next.
|
|
|
Scaffolding of Process
|
0 points
The process lacks strategies and organizational tools needed for students to gain the knowledge needed to complete the task.
Activities are of little significance to one another and/or to the accomplishment of the task.
|
3 points
Strategies and organizational tools embedded in the process are insufficient to ensure that all students will gain the knowledge needed to complete the task.
Some of the activities do not relate specifically to the accomplishment of the task.
|
6 points
The process provides students coming in at different entry levels with strategies and organizational tools to access and gain the knowledge needed to complete the task.
Activities are clearly related and designed to take the students from basic knowledge to higher level thinking.
|
|
|
Richness of Process
|
0 points
Few steps.
|
1 points
More complex activities required.
|
3 points
The lesson helps students understand different perspectives and/or share responsibility in accomplishing the task.
|
|
|
Total Score
|
/70
|
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.